ENPI News
Asia News

Lawyers reveal Ashton’s EEAS proposal breaches EU law, warn development NGOs

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

MEDIA STATEMENT by CIDSE, Oxfam International, APRODEV, CONCORD, EUROSTEP and One International - for immediate release, 26 April 2010

Lawyers reveal Ashton’s EEAS proposal breaches EU law, warn development NGOs

Development organisations demand urgent revision of the current proposal as it puts world’s poorest at risk

Development organisations  from across Europe and beyond call for an urgent review of the proposal on the European External Action Service (EEAS) by foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, at the EU Foreign Ministers’ meeting today in Luxembourg. The blueprint breaches the Lisbon Treaty and goes against common EU interest and that of the world’s poorest, the NGOs warn.

What are the lawyers saying?

  • “The role of the EEAS under the Treaties is restricted to the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), which represents only part of the EU’s external action. Development cooperation is outside the scope of the CFSP and therefore the EEAS has no capacity in respect of it.” (1.2)
  • The Ashton proposal, which is intended as an instrument setting out the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, cannot alter areas of competence as defined under the Treaties, such as the ‘exclusive competence’ of the Commission in development cooperation activities. Detracting from the exclusive competence of the Commission would require a formal Treaty amendment.” (3.11)
  • “As primary law the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) is binding on all EU institutions and therefore irrespective of whether the EEAS becomes involved in development cooperation activities, poverty reduction must remain the ‘primary objective’.” (4.1)

What is Baroness Ashton putting on the table?

  • EEAS to have unprecedented control over development cooperation and its budget.
  • To mix intergovernmental and community policy.
  • To make poverty reduction objectives subject to foreign policy interests.

What are NGOs calling for?

Developing groups are calling for a complete review of Ashton’s proposal which involves all stakeholders: European Commission, European Council, European Parliament, and civil society, to ensure that:

  • The spirit and letter of the Lisbon Treaty are fully respected.
  • The European Commission maintains full control over the development budget
  • The binding objective of “poverty eradication” towards developing countries is fully respected.

Signatories

Laura Sullivan, European Policy and Campaigns Manager, ActionAid International – Camilo Tovar, Coordinador Representación en Europa, Asociacion Latinoamericana de Organizaciones de Promocion del Desarrollo – Matyas Benyik, President, ATTAC Hungary – Nick Roseveare, Chief Executive, Bond UK – Tommaso Rondinella, Policy Officer, Campagna Sbilanciamoci, Italy – Bernd Nilles, Secretary General, CIDSE – Rina Valeur Rasmussen, Secretary General, Concord Danmark – Jean-Louis Vielajus, President, Coordination SUD – Simon Stocker, Director, Eurostep – Dr. V Rukmini Rao, President, Gramya Resource Centre for Women, India – Vagn Berthelsen, Secretary General, IBIS, Denmark – Marcin Wojtalik, Board Member, Institute of Global Responsibility, Poland – Vicky Claeys, Regional Director, IPPF European Network – Michael Gatt, Treasurer/ Board Member, Kopin, Malta – Dr. Arjun Karki, Coordinator, LDC watch – Geetha Lakmini, Admin Secretary, National Fisheries Solidarity Movement, Sri Lanka – Malgorzata Tarasiewicz, Director, Network of East-West Women/NEWW-Polska  – Jeremy Hobbs, Executive Director, Oxfam International – Dr. Sarba Raj Khadka, Coordinator, South Asian Alliance for Poverty Eradication – Gideon Rabinowitz, Coordinator, UK Aid Network - Herman Kumara, General Secretary, World Forum of Fisher Peoples' [WFFP]

ENDS

Contact: Roeland Scholtalbers, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; +32477068384 - Angela Corbalan, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , +32473562260

Note to the editors

Daily global health news summaries provided by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • 6 Feb - Sugar Poses Significant Health Risks, Should Be Regulated Like Alcohol, U.S. Researchers Say
    "Sugar poses enough health risks that it should be considered a controlled substance just like alcohol and tobacco, contend a team of researchers from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)," in an opinion piece called "The Toxic Truth About Sugar," published in the journal Nature on Wednesday, TIME's "Healthland" blog reports (Rochman, 2/2). "While acknowledging that food, unlike alcohol and tobacco, is required for survival, [authors Robert Lustig, Laura Schmidt and Claire Brindis] say taxes, zoning ordinances and even age limits for purchasing certain sugar-laden products are all appropriate remedies for what they see as a not-so-sweet problem," the Wall Street Journal's "Health" blog writes (Hobson, 2/2).
  • 6 Feb - Panel Discussion Shows Heated Controversy Over H5N1 Research
    "The controversy over research about potentially dangerous H5N1 viruses heated up [Thursday night] in a New York City debate that featured some of the leading voices exchanging blunt comments on the alleged risks and benefits of publishing or withholding the full details of the studies," CIDRAP News reports. "The debate, sponsored by the New York Academy of Sciences, involved two members of the biosecurity advisory board that called for 'redacting' the two studies in question to delete details, along with scientists who want the full studies published and representatives of Science and Nature, the two journals involved," the news service adds (Roos, 2/3).
  • 6 Feb - Supporting Scientific Evidence Under PEPFAR To End AIDS
    On Wednesday, several HIV experts spoke at a Capitol Hill briefing "supporting the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program's reliance on scientific evidence to drive its work to end AIDS," the Center for Global Health Policy's "Science Speaks" blog reports. The speakers, including Diane Havlir of the University of California, San Francisco, RJ Simonds of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Renee Ridzon of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Chris Beyrer of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, talked about using antiretroviral treatment as a prevention method, the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission, voluntary medical male circumcision, and preventing HIV among marginalized populations at high risk of infection (Mazzotta, 2/3).
  • 6 Feb - WHO Disputes Study's Claims That Global Malaria Deaths Are Double Current Estimates
    The WHO has disputed a study published last week in the Lancet "that claims nearly twice as many people are dying of malaria than current estimates," VOA News reports. The WHO "says both its estimates of malaria deaths and those of the Lancet study are statistically the same for all groups in all regions," with one exception, VOA writes, noting, "WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl says there's a notable statistical difference in regard to children over five and adults in Africa."
  • 6 Feb - Dispute Over Malaria Figures Highlights Lack Of Certainty In Data In Age Of 'Information Overload'
    In this post in TIME World's "Global Spin" blog, TIME's Africa bureau chief Alex Perry examines questions surrounding an Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) study published in the Lancet on Friday that suggests "malaria kills almost twice as many people a year as previously believed," writing, "If correct, at a stroke that overturns medical consensus, makes a nonsense of decades of World Health Organization (WHO) statistics -- the official malaria numbers -- and plunges the current multibillion-dollars anti-malaria campaign, and the push to reach a 2015 deadline for achieving the eight Millennium Development Goals, into grave doubt."