ENPI News
Asia News

This is Time for Action on Inequality

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

This week Social Watch Europe presented a report: “Responding to Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality in Europe and Beyond”, with a subtitle: “Time for Action”. The launch took place in Brussels as protesters in Tunisia, Egypt and neighbouring countries went to the street. The report identifies exclusion inside and outside Europe as the cause of frustration and social unrest, which in countries neighbouring the EU has been exacerbated by political exclusion. Within the Arab region 92 million people live in poverty.

The parallel with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 is striking. Identical to the current crisis, the protests then were caused by social and political exclusion of the majority of people in their country, not as a reaction to the geo-political reality at the time. It demonstrated the failure of the military strategy (at the time of the Soviet Union) that underestimated the importance of bread and butter issues. In 1989 the heads of state in office were completely taken by surprise and were finding their feet step by step in the new reality, as we find is the case in the current crisis. All eyes were focused on (the old) President Bush and President Gorbachev of the then USSR – and the key question as to whether they would grasp the opportunity to end the Cold War. The question today is, will the opportunity be seized for a new order in the Middle East that could make peace in the region possible?

The final parallel is the momentum that the change in the East gave to Europe itself, which under the leadership of President Jacques Delors seized the momentum for an assertive approach to strengthen the European Union’s global role, foster democracy in eastern Europe and bring prosperity to impoverished countries in the region, by uniting the continent of Europe under the political flag of the European Union. Enlargement increased the European market and brought political stability in the Europe-wide region.

Click here to read Mirjam van Reisen's op-ed published in New Europe.

 

It's time, also for the international community, to try democracy

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

By Vidar Helgeson, Secretary-General of IDEA

A comment by former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair epitomizes the somewhat hesitant response of the international community to the democratic uprising in Egypt: "you cannot be sure what type of change will be produced there." True. If democracy is allowed to run its course, you cannot be sure. This is the beauty of democracy, of allowing citizens to freely elect their leaders.

Democracy is not the certain outcome of current events, but the desire for democracy is certainly the driving force for millions and millions in Egypt and beyond. While social tensions – and, in particular, mass youth unemployment – played a role as triggers, causes are deeper and political. They will not go away with a couple of top-down measures to reshuffle cabinets, bring down food prices or increase public sector salaries. President Ben Ali of Tunisia did somehow get that message quickly. In Egypt, the belated and half-hearted response of the regime has been further discredited by violence against peaceful demonstrators and the outcome, at this moment, is uncertain. Different spill-over effects are felt in Yemen, Jordan, Syria, Algeria and other countries of the region.

Read the full article from IDEA

 

The State of Poverty and Food Sovereignity in South Asia

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

By Farooq Tariq

The devastation caused by recent floods has reached alarming proportions. Human sufferings have been aggravated by severe blows dealt to the agricultural sector, which will have longer-term impacts. Standing crops have been washed away and millions of livestock lost. Agriculture is the prime source of income in major parts of the flood-affected areas and the losses incurred have had a direct effect on the livelihoods of the peasants. The losses sustained by the agricultural sector will also worsen food insecurity situation across the country with more acute effects in those flood affected.

The scale of the human tragedy is enormous. To put it in some perspective, the flood waters submerged one-fifth of Pakistan; culminating in 1600 dead, about 20 million people displaced and 17 million acres of farmland destroyed. Pakistan’s towns, villages, crops, livestock, personal possessions and infrastructure were completely washed away. The flood waters destroyed the country’s infrastructure like bridges, irrigation canals, homes, roads and railway tracks and six power plants that supply electricity to factories. Pakistan prime agricultural regions, the highly fertile and productive Punjab, Sindh and Khaiber Pukhtoon Khawa were completely underwater.

Tragically the flood hit the most fertile food growing areas. Gilgit, Swat, Charsada, Swabi, Nowshera to Larkana, Dadu and Matiari are food growing pockets and contribute a reasonable share in country’s food and grain economy. Major losses of crops, orchards, cattle, fodder, cotton and other major cash crops had a serious setback on the economy. This will create food scarcity and insecurity for many in coming months.

Read full article

   

Letter to Catherine Ashton on the situation in Egypt

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

The European Union must support the popular revolutions in Egypt and in other dictatorial regimes in the Arab Region

The eruption of the people’s revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and other countries in the region is a response to years of political oppression, and the implementation of economic and social policies that have impoverished increasing number of citizens. While economies in the region have been growing, benefiting a privileged minority, large sections of the population have been denied access to affordable social services and the basic necessities of life for themselves and their families. Their rights have been eroded. For too long significant numbers of citizens living in the Arab region have been facing social, economic and political marginalization.

The spontaneous demonstrations in Tunisia and Egypt were initially responding to social and economic hardship. They have been rapidly transformed into political expressions of mass mobilization, reflecting the basic links between political and socio‐economic rights.

The determination of the people to bring democracy to their countries is both courageous and inspiring. In Egypt the Mubarak regime will not go easily, as the increasing violent response to pro democracy supporters demonstrates. It is likely that the outcome will be determined in the next few hours.

As you are acutely aware, the EU’s response to the popular demands for change, and the actions by autocratic regimes towards these popular manifestations, will be a significant determinant for future relations with the Arab states and their peoples. The current framework for the Union’s partnership with the region has formerly been based on respect for human rights, equality, democracy and adherence to the rule of law. The Euro--‐Mediterranean partnership seeks to promote solidarity and mutual respect between peoples, and the eradication of poverty.

The reality has been somewhat different. The EU has been building close partnerships with the oppressive regimes controlling their countries, including the ousted regime in Tunisia and the disclaimed regime in Egypt. EU policies have helped to maintain the regimes in office at the expense of the rights and livelihoods of the majority of their citizens. The economic and social policies that have been pursued in the name of this partnership may have helped achieve economic growth; but they have clearly contributed to increased poverty, social exclusion and inequality.

If supporting dictatorial regimes has been seen as the way to maintain Europe’s security, current events demonstrate the fragility of such strategies. In neglecting the interests of ordinary citizens, this strategy was never sustainable. This can only be assured by genuine democratic processes. In the current turbulent situation there is clearly a need to secure a viable transition. However, asking autocratic governments to reform themselves and implement such changes is unlikely to result in genuine democracy. The current regimes will not enable the space required, but seek to continue exerting control. This will only lead to further frustration and alienation in which “extremism” is more likely to flourish.

There is a need to empower democratic alternatives whether from civil society or political movements. For this to be possible the dictatorial regimes must go. Only then can there be more space for such alternatives to be empowered.

The current events in the region offer an opportunity similar to the popular demonstrations that resulted in the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the cold war. The opportunity must be grasped. The EU can, and must act with responses that support and help in this process. This must include encouraging the rapid departure of discredited leaders and their allies; encouraging the creation and maintenance of the space in which democratic alternatives can be built; and working to prevent external interventions that seek to subvert the outcome, not least from Israel. The dictatorial regimes in the region, and the Mubarak regime in particular, must be left in no doubt that their actions will not be tolerated, and the EU’s aid should be stopped if they continue.

It is inevitable that the institutions and apparatus of the current regimes will not change overnight. Indeed there is clear evidence of their attempts to turn back the tide of reform. In Egypt the orchestrated and violent confrontations instigated by ‘pro--‐Mubarak supporters’ and reports we have received today of military police raids on the offices of respected civil society organisations affiliated to ANND, and the arrests of their clearly aim to undermine the capacity of the current protests to continue.

The ongoing response from these institutions will continue to be driven by past policy and practice defined by decades of dictatorship and oppression. The concept of state security, which has been synonymous with the security of the regime, must be transformed to a comprehensive human security approach in which adherence to human rights, social justice and sustainable development are at the core.

This not only requires the fostering of the demands for genuine democratic processes, but also an urgent and rapid assessment of the current economic policies and social models so as to ensure that they can actually deliver this broader approach to human security and according to the principles of the partnership. This includes reviewing elements of those policies such as trade liberalisation and deregulation that have undeniably contributed to increased social and economic exclusion for large number of people.

While the main responsibility for this lies within the countries of the region themselves, it is also crucial that future EU policies and their implementation are revised to ensure that they support these processes and address the real needs and aspirations of people in the region. Civil society organisations will have a crucial role to play in the process of transition, but their ability to engage effectively will be constrained without access to adequate resources. The EU, its member states and other donors could provide vital support in this regard.

Future EU policies must truly reflect the values and objectives of the Barcelona process, be rooted in a comprehensive partnership that seeks peace and stability, shared prosperity, and social cultural and human partnerships. The EU should also play an active role within the international community to foster support for this approach. The EU’s future relationship with the region must be based on a partnership that benefits all. It is only when this is achieved that peace and stability within the region will be possible.

The Mubarak regime has not yet accepted defeat and will continue to seek the destruction of the people’s revolution. Should they succeed the opportunities to achieve far reaching reform – not just in Egypt but also in the region as a whole – will be lost. We sincerely hope that this will not be the outcome, and that we are indeed at the beginning of a new era.

Ziad Abdel Samad, Director, Arab NGO Network for Development

Roberto Bissio, Coordinator, Social Watch

Simon Stocker, Director, Eurostep